<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Invaluable Leader &#187; natural sytle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://furtwengler.com/theinvaluableleader/tag/natural-sytle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://furtwengler.com/theinvaluableleader</link>
	<description>Attract opportunities instead of pursuing them using counter-intuitive thinking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Experimenter or Synthesizer?</title>
		<link>http://furtwengler.com/theinvaluableleader/2009/04/20/experimenter-or-synthesizer/</link>
		<comments>http://furtwengler.com/theinvaluableleader/2009/04/20/experimenter-or-synthesizer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cimaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counter-intuitive thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclectic education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural sytle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://furtwengler.com/theinvaluableleader/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each of us has a natural propensity for discovering solutions to problems&#8230;
&#8230;what&#8217;s yours?
In his book, The Cerebral Symphony, William Calvin notes that in the scientific community there are experimenters and synthesizers.  Experimenters are people who exploit new techniques for looking deeper into whatever question they&#8217;re investigating. 
Conversely, synthesizers take the vast array of discoveries from a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Each of us has a natural propensity for discovering solutions to problems&#8230;</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="color: #800000;">&#8230;what&#8217;s yours?</span></em></strong></p>
<p>In his book, The Cerebral Symphony, William Calvin notes that in the scientific community there are experimenters and synthesizers.  Experimenters are people who exploit new techniques for looking deeper into whatever question they&#8217;re investigating. </p>
<p>Conversely, synthesizers take the vast array of discoveries from a variety of disciplines to piece together a holistic view of the way things work.  Calvin goes on to say that, while both approaches contribute to scientific progress, few scientists employ both.</p>
<p>What does that have to do with you?  First it affords new insights into the way you prefer to work &#8211; your natural style.  Here&#8217;s a quick question to gauge your preference.  Given a choice of projects would you prefer to tear apart a process to discover ways to improve it or would you rather gather information from someone who has done that analysis and use it to establish new procedures? </p>
<p>Some people enjoy the investigative intrigue problem-solving affords.  Others prefer to learn from others and use that knowledge to get ahead of the curve by establishing new policies and procedures to avoid the problem in the future.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s counter-intuitive, but awareness of your natural style (experimenter or synthesizer) and the style of your colleagues prefer, can help you, your boss and your team enjoy greater success.  Helping guide the delegation of tasks based on natural preferences can increase job enjoyment, reduce cycle times and dramatically improve results now and in the future.</p>
<p>The <strong>7 Steps to Becoming INVALUABLE</strong> program I offer is designed to help you see more effective ways of doing business &#8211; ways that dramatically improve your bottom line while making your life easier.  In today&#8217;s blog I used Step 6, Eclectic Education, to demonstrate how to import insights and ideas from other disciplines.  In this case I drew from the field of neurophysiology.  I also employed Step 4, Seeing Similarities, to apply those insights to business.</p>
<p>As you share these insights at work don&#8217;t forget Step 2, The Persuasion Myth.  Your natural tendency will be to try to convince your colleagues and boss how valuable this approach is.  The more you try to persuade them the more resistance you&#8217;ll get. </p>
<p>Step 2, The Persuasion Myth, suggests that you share the concept with your colleagues, then ask them how they think this approach could be used in your organization.  You&#8217;ll find that they&#8217;re more likely to embrace the concept once they&#8217;ve had a chance to do their own evaluation of it.</p>
<p>You can learn more about the 7 Steps to Becoming INVALUABLE program and how it can help you deal with the business challenges you face by clicking on <a href="http://www.furtwengler.com/7steps.htm">http://www.furtwengler.com/7steps.htm</a></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="color: #800000;">Please share your thoughts, whether you agree or not, by posting a comment.  If there are topics you&#8217;d like me to address, send me an email at </span></em></strong><a href="mailto:dale@furtwengler.com">dale@furtwengler.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://furtwengler.com/theinvaluableleader/2009/04/20/experimenter-or-synthesizer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
